• Home
  • Essays
  • The Growing Effects of Nuclear Weapons on International Relations

The Growing Effects of Nuclear Weapons on International Relations

The Growing Effects of Nuclear Weapons on International Relations

Introduction

Nuclear weapon refers to a volatile maneuver that its disparaging force originates from reactions of fusion and fission to release a huge amount of energy. The first nation to taste their nuclear weapons was United Sates in 1945 in Nagasaki and Hiroshima cities (Tehranian 1999, P.65). The United Kingdom, China, and France followed, which led to the formation of Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) to negotiate the ranking and control of nuclear (Alagappa 2008, P. 189). The use of the atomic bomb by the U.S. brought a great change to the appearance of the world by notifying the world of the presence of the modern atomic energy. The main basis of this essay is to expound on the use nuclear weapons and its growing effects on the world.

The United States exhibition of the atomic bomb indicated their supremacy and authority in the military technology. Those countries who did not possess any military machinery had to surrender and work under the control of those with the influential weapons. The nuclear weapon states are France, China, Russia, U.S., and the United Kingdom (Anscombe 2012, P. 45). The artilleries are the quickest method to terminate and win a dreadful war. The North Korea’s warning to destroy the South triggered the U.S. to stop them from evolving their weapons (Alagappa 2008, P. 189). Disarmament of nuclear weapon does not stop the development of future weapons, but rather provide an equal platform for both non-atomic and fissile weapons.

The U.S. move to drop the first World Missile Defense (WMD) on Japan created issues revolving around combat, war, and diplomacy. The international conflict continues to develop with nations testing their weapon superiority over others (Tehranian 1999, P.65). The attempt of Iraq to develop its atomic bombs lead a debate on the agreement over a civilian nuclear power. There are major motives for the world to stop developing nuclear weapons. Stereotypic politicians can use them for personal interest against the opposition to meet political destinations. The weapons also have great environmental effects to the world such as global warming, large-scale destruction, mass death, and biodiversity. However, countries possessing the weapons guard them as their main source of security against dreadful conflicts.

Nuclear bombs are however beneficial to international affairs. They assist in managing the predictable proliferations in the world since nations develop fear from each other. The panic that another nation may use their weapons has a great impact on the intra-nations relations. The nuclear possessions reduce chances for uncontrolled was between India and Pakistan (Alagappa 2008, P. 189). They also help to stop the re-evolutionary spacecraft on the planet. The spaceship can destroy the world’s human and natural resource causing a change in evolution. Therefore, the consensual noncombatant atomic collaboration agreement is the best way to promote both controlled and diplomatic expenditure of nuclear energy.

The majority do not understand the reasons behind the United States decision on the few countries with the legal ownership of the nuclear weapons. For instance, the fear Iraq may use their atomic bomb to destroy the world is not clear evidence for their denial to own them. The question of the current state of foreign affairs in the U.S. therefore rises. According to Billias (2010 P. 98), it is the threat and fear that keeps nations from initiating World War III. Types of weapons that cause mass destruction and death created a multiple number of armed individuals. The international community and the environment face increasing hostility.

Bibliography

Tehranian, M. (1999). Worlds apart: human security and global governance. London [u.a.], Tourism. Vol. 2, no. 11, P. 65

Billias, N. (2010). Promoting and producing evil. Amsterdam [etc.], Rodopi. Vol. 2, no. 1, P.p. 680

Alagappa, M. (2008). The long shadow: nuclear weapons and security in 21st century Asia. Stanford, Calif, Stanford University Press. Vol. 3, P. 189

Anscombe, G. E. M. (2012). Nuclear weapons, a Catholic response. New York, Sheed and Ward. P. 45

Releated Posts

Unlocking Banking Innovation: The Power of Knowledge Management

Introduction In the banking industry, knowledge management has become inseparable due to the rapid change in landscape of…

ByByGilbert TaylorOct 10, 2023

ACCT 2001 Business Valuation Using Accounting Analytics

School of Accounting, Economics and Finance ACCT 2001 Business Valuation Using Accounting Analytics Group Assignment (35%) Information Sheet…

ByByGilbert TaylorOct 10, 2023

Optimizing Deliveroo’s Website for Improved User Experience

Executive Summary Website is an essential element of marketing as well as a tool for the improvement of…

ByByGilbert TaylorSep 17, 2023

Enhancing Business Communication with Email

Professional Email Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation Advantages of Using Email to the Business Professional One of the advantages…

ByByGilbert TaylorSep 16, 2023
Leave a Reply